On 01/05/13 21:25, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 04/27/2013 01:52 AM, tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote: >> From: Tomas Frydrych <to...@sleepfive.com> >> >> There is no good reason for ia32 machines to have hard dependency on grub, >> as there are other bootloaders available for ia32 platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Frydrych <to...@sleepfive.com> >> --- >> meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc >> b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc >> index 921c740..cb542a5 100644 >> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc >> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc >> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ MACHINE_FEATURES += "screen keyboard pci usbhost ext2 ext3 >> x86 \ >> acpi serial usbgadget alsa" >> >> MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "kernel-modules eee-acpi-scripts" >> -MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS += "grub" > > Agreed - but do the images still build as currently written after you > remove it here?
I have not tested the efi path, though I think the grub-efi.bbclass takes care of the grub dependency. In the non-efi case the grub dependency is taken care of by initramfs-live-install.bb. Tomas -- http://sleepfive.com _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
