On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:33 +0800, Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2013年06月28日 17:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Hi Kai,
> >
> > On Friday 28 June 2013 15:48:47 Kai Kang wrote:
> >> Because qt could not be built on mips64 with 64 bits userspace, set
> >> COMPATIBLE_HOST for qt related packagegroups to disable them on mips64
> >> with 64 bit userspace too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.k...@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb | 3 +++
> >> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb | 3 +++
> >> .../packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc | 3 +++
> >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb
> >> b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb index
> >> 315df33..c993242 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb
> >> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Qt package groups"
> >> LICENSE = "MIT"
> >> PR = "r4"
> >>
> >> +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace
> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32"
> >> +
> >> inherit packagegroup
> >>
> >> PACKAGES = "${PN}-demoapps"
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb
> >> b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb index
> >> 9263828..6ef844f 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb
> >> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ SUMMARY = "Qt for Embedded Linux (Qt without X11)"
> >> PR = "r2"
> >> LICENSE = "MIT"
> >>
> >> +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace
> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32"
> >> +
> >> inherit packagegroup
> >>
> >> # For backwards compatibility after rename
> >> diff --git
> >> a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc
> >> b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc index
> >> 8413eec..fc1ccba 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> >> LICENSE = "MIT"
> >>
> >> +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace
> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32"
> >> +
> >> inherit packagegroup
> >>
> >> PACKAGEGROUP_DISABLE_COMPLEMENTARY = "1"
> > I'm fine with the other change; the question is is this one needed in
> > addition?
> > Since the packagegroup-*qt* recipes reference packages from Qt which itself
> > inherits qt4x11/qt4e bbclasses, surely trying to build these will
> > immediately
> > fail for mips64 anyway?
>
> Yes, it will fail immediately. What I want to do is to underline these
> packagegroups' build platform.
> If you believe that they are redundant, I retrieve the patch 2/2.
At a guess the one advantage of this is to clean up what "bitbake world"
would show?
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
