On Tuesday 25 June 2013 16:35:13 Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 24 June 2013 10:27, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \ > > > > ${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce > > ${PN}-rtl8192su \ > > ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330 > > ${PN}-bcm4334 \ > > > > - ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k > > ${PN}-ath9k" + ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k > > ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ + ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence > > ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6" > > Does it matter whether you use "licence" or "license"?
For consistency I think it does. I also discovered an incorrect filename at the same time as looking into this. I've sent a patch to fix these. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core