On 06/30/2013 11:56 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 27 June 2013 10:08, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: >> See GNU Savannah bug 30612 -- make 3.82 is known to be broken. >> >> A number of vendors are providing a modified version, so checking >> for just the version string is not enough. We also need to check >> if the patch for the issue has been applied. We use a modified >> version of the reproduced to check for the issue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> >> --- >> + >> + if status != 0: >> + return "Your version of make 3.82 is broken. Please revert to >> 3.81 or install a patched version.\n" > > > Instead of returning an error and asking the user to manually update > their own 'make', wouldn't it be better if bitbake simply built its > own known-to-be-working -native version instead? In this way a good, > working version of 'make' could be installed in a potential SDK's > sysroot as well?
Is the broken version good enough to build a working version? Philip > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
