On 2 July 2013 17:21, Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.pa...@intel.com> wrote: >> The file always has content because the file in the main recipe has a >> comment in. Personally I think not installing a useless file is the >> right thing to do, so we should change the default pointercal.xinput >> to be empty. > Then why install it at all if it's empty? I believe a zero sized file in > /etc it's even worse.
Exactly, this test will spot the empty file and not install it. >> Relatedly, interestingly Weston has a different approach and attaches >> the calibration to the device using udev properties, which means >> systems where touch devices can be hotplugged actually work. I'm >> incredibly tempted to extend xinput-calibrator to write out udev >> fragments and make Xi respect them if they exist... > > Ross, you requested (according to the description in bugzilla: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4416#c0 ) to just move > xinput-calibrator to oe-core from meta-oe. Technically, the first > patchset did just that. It would have been easier for me, from the > planning point of view at least, if I had known in advance the > additional changes you needed for this package. I admit I don't know how > all packages in oe-core or meta-oe should or shouldn't work... I'm > working on improving that though. ;) My talk of udev properties is just talk, I should have made that clear: it's nothing I expect you to do. Once the systemd bits are purged entirely, I'm happy to see this merged. Cheers, Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
