On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 16:14 +0300, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > Before the rework, the metadata (for opkg at least) was deleted no > matter what during rootfs generation. So, there's no way this case (no > 'package-management' in IMAGE_FEATURES and opkg installed) worked > recently. > > Anyway, do we have a better idea? The solution Phil suggested, is not > quite ok... We'll end up with useless metadata if no PM is installed and > delayed postinstalls are present or, the other case, have the PM > installed with no metadata if the PM is installed but we have no delayed > postinstalls...
What is it that actually causes run-postinsts to fail when opkg is installed? I guess that's the bit that I'm not understanding at the moment. As far as I can tell from a quick inspection of run-postinsts itself, it ought to be unperturbed by opkg's presence and no harm ought to result. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
