On 18 September 2013 17:07, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 16:14 +0100, Paul Barker wrote: >> On 19 August 2013 19:32, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: >> > On 8/19/13 1:08 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> >> >> On 08/14/2013 01:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> >>> +Upstream-status: Pending >> >> >> >> I'm the new maintainer for opkg, > > Congratulations! :) >
My time for this is fairly limited, but felt it was important that someone maintain it as it's a critical dependency for a lot of us. As I understand things the Yocto Project is currently in a stabilisation cycle. So my plan was to wait until 1.5 is released and then look at moving oe-core to opkg-0.2.0, adding PACKAGECONFIG options (I've got a signed package feed I'd like my target to be able to verify, this needs opkg to be built with --enable-gpg) and whatever else needs doing. For now the experimental recipes are available from https://bitbucket.org/opkg/meta-opkg. As a side question - is there a specific maintainer for opkg-utils? I'd like to discuss whether two separate repositories is a good idea or whether we'd benefit from merging this into the opkg repo. -- Paul Barker Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk http://www.paulbarker.me.uk _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core