On 09/27/2013 04:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:07 +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Richard Purdie >> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> With 1.5 approaching I'd like to have the issue solved as soon as possible. >> Richard, when is deadline for core-patches? > > Basically ASAP. The next release build is the start of next week but any > patches going into that need to have been run through an autobuilder > cycle first. > > This is the first I've heard of the problem, other than some comments > about possible problems on irc. Can someone please open up a bug for > this and clearly describe what used to work and now doesn't and what the > possible fixes or workarounds are? > > I don't think anyone likes regressions however if we don't have the open > bug, its very hard to track. > > You say you've talked to Bruce/Jason but why didn't the discussion > happen on the mailing list? That way others may have been able to help > and now I could read back the list and see for myself what the issue is. > As it is, I simply don't know other than the need to set a new variable > which is hinted at above... >
What was needed most was a defect detailing the configuration setup. The reason I have not hit this problem nor any of the other autobuilders was that it required a very specific way to setup the recipes to depend on each other, but not circularly. Andrea sent full details to Bruce, who sent them to me and I built it this morning. It took very little time to isolate the problem but it was one of those oh so subtle issues (patch is sent to oe-core). Perhaps in the future we can just get a Bugzilla opened right away. I don't like regressions either. :-) Andrea replied to me in IRC, "I'll test the new patch soon". Cheers, Jason. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core