On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 09:06 +0100, Hans Beckérus wrote: > I am having some trouble with these patches :( The new approach is > using the '-n' flag to the 'cp' command. > That is not supported on our SuSE11 based system. To be honest, I do > not know how portable '-n' is? > Some system have it, others seems to provide '-u' instead. I guess by > removing '-n' part of the performance gain is lost? > Would it be possible to test for error from the 'cp' command and if it > fails try '-u' instead (and cache the result)? Or maybe > even better, make this configurable in local.conf (or the distro) for > the build platforms that does not support '-n' but can > instead fall-back to using '-u'. From what I can tell most systems > support one or the other, but never both.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/t2&id=276b9df3588ecd438c3e2f502d56cd6b9fb24676 Thankfully the above works just as well. I used -n to get rid of an error, then added -l for efficiency. We can get away just with -l. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
