On 11/13/2013 08:30 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 13 November 2013 10:08, Zhong Hongbo <hongbo.zh...@windriver.com> wrote:
+++
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4-4.101/fix-no-module-name-GObject-for-simple-agent.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+Fix No module name gi.repository and GObject for simple-agent
+
+Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo <hongbo.zh...@windriver.com>
Patch needs an Upstream-Status ("Inappropriate [revert]" would be
suitable), and please rename the patch/comment to something more
accurate along the lines of "use legacy pygobject instead of
gobject-introspection".
This patch do not in upstream. I do the change and test it in my x86_64
platform.
What status should fill in Upstream-Status.
Thanks,
Hongbo
Ross
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
