Op 6 jan. 2014, om 23:10 heeft Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> het volgende 
geschreven:

> On 12/31/2013 06:18 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> Ping?
>> 
>> Alternatively, the system could also have an option for further
>> fine-tuning what to do with git patches
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote:
>>> It is better to use "git am" when possible to preserve the commit messages 
>>> and
>>> the mail format in general for patches when those are present. A typical use
>>> case is when developers would like to keep the changes on top of the latest
>>> upstream, and they may occasionally need to rebase. This is not possible 
>>> with
>>> "git diff" and "diff" generated patches.
>>> 
>>> Since this is not always the case, the fallback would be the "git apply"
>>> operation which is currently available.
>>> 
> Looking at this, is it possible to detect a git patch and only then use git 
> am?  Since most of the patches carried in oe-core and other layers the 'git 
> am' will typically fail

All the patches I add are git am'able since I use a patch similar to this :) A 
big timesaver is to check for  a .git/ in $WORKDIR otherwise git am will try to 
use a top level git tree (e.g. combo repo) and that's not what we want.

regards,

Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to