Op 9 jan. 2014, om 01:32 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:21:08PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> In my opinion... >>> >>> Personally I would be in favour of removing GTK+ and the GNOME UI from >>> the core and putting them in their own layer for all the same reasons I >>> think Qt should be in its own layer: >>> - a "basic" image doesn't need them >>> - we can have different layers to track separate major releases (as with >>> qt3, qt4, and qt5) >> >> The trouble is, if you have no toolkit at all, how do you test that X still >> works properly? The selection we have provides a single unit allowing us to >> test the entire stack reasonably well without having to add anything else. I >> think that's a valuable thing to have. > > By testing oe-core + layer with X. > > Everybody else is using oe-core + couple of other layers, why do we need > to make oe-core testable with X _in single_ layer? I have never seen a good explanation for that > I'm not saying that oe-core should be tested with 30 layers like my > world build, but why cannot AB have special build which builds > > oe-core + meta-xorg + meta-gnome > > and runs some runtime QA tests on that and then some other build with > > oe-core + meta-python > > for piglit tests? And e.g. meta-xorg could live inside the oe-core git repo if additional git repos are too scary. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core