On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner <trevor.woer...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here > is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it > be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are > suspected of being, unmaintained?
Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? > > > meta-aarch64 > meta-acer > meta-ada > meta-android > meta-angstrom > meta-arago-distro > meta-arago-extras > meta-asus > meta-aurora > meta-baryon > meta-beagleboard > meta-beagleboard-extras > meta-browser > meta-bug > meta-buglabs > meta-chicken > meta-chiefriver > meta-clutter > meta-crownbay > meta-crystalforest > meta-cubox > meta-darwin > meta-eca > meta-efikamx > meta-efl > meta-eldk > meta-emenlow > meta-erlang > meta-ettus > meta-filesystems > meta-fri2 > meta-fsl-arm > meta-fsl-arm-extra > meta-fsl-demos > meta-fsl-ppc > meta-fso > meta-games > meta-geeksphone > meta-gir > meta-gnome > meta-gpe > meta-gstreamer10 > meta-guacamayo > meta-gumstix > meta-gumstix-community > meta-gumstix-extras > meta-hamradio > meta-handheld > meta-hipos > meta-htc > meta-igep > meta-initramfs > meta-intel > meta-ivi > meta-jasperforest > meta-java > meta-kde > meta-kernel-dev maintained. > meta-kirkwood > meta-linaro > meta-linaro-toolchain > meta-lsi > meta-lxcbench > meta-measured > meta-mentor > meta-micro > meta-mingw > meta-minnow > meta-mono > meta-multimedia > meta-n450 > meta-netbookpro > meta-netmodule > meta-networking > meta-nokia > meta-nslu2 > meta-nuc > meta-oe > meta-openmoko > meta-openpandora > meta-openstack > meta-openstack-compute-deploy > meta-openstack-controller-deploy > meta-openstack-qemu All openstack layers are maintained. > meta-opie > meta-oracle-java > meta-osmocombb > meta-ouya > meta-palm > meta-perl > meta-picosam9 > meta-qt3 > meta-qt5 > meta-raspberrypi > meta-realtime mantained > meta-ro-rootfs > meta-romley > meta-ros > meta-ruby > meta-samsung > meta-sdr > meta-security > meta-selinux > meta-shr > meta-shr-distro > meta-slugos > meta-smalltalk > meta-sourcery > meta-sugarbay > meta-sunxi > meta-sys940x > meta-systemd > meta-telephony > meta-telldus > meta-ti > meta-tlk > meta-tracing > meta-virtualization maintained But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned it quickly. Bruce > meta-web-kiosk > meta-webos > meta-webos-ports > meta-webserver > meta-woce > meta-x10 > meta-xfce > meta-xilinx > meta-xilinx-community > meta-yassl > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp > meta-zynq > meta-zynq-milo > openembedded-core > toolchain-layer > > > Thank you for your input, and best regards, > Trevor > > > > > [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core