Hello Robert. I have just resend the patch. Is there any document describing this conventions?
Thanks! On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com> wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > > > On 03/17/2014 03:59 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> >> Hello Richard. >> >> I have tested it with dora. I can rebase it. >> > > If it is for dora, then the Subject should in include [dora] > > >> Shall I rebase it over git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky or over >> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core >> > > I think that openembedded-core is preferred. > > // Robert > > >> Thanks! >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Richard Purdie >> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 14:27 +0100, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >>>> >>>> Use apt-ftparchive to create a Release file compatible with SecureApt. >>>> >>>> apt-ftparchive is not compatible with libpseudo. The calls to ftw() >>>> returns the path in absolute format instead of relative. This produces >>>> wrong Packages and Release files. >>>> >>>> ie: >>>> MD5Sum: >>>> d20227a958f6870137ce0e41b7b84307 1453 >>>> >>>> /home/ricardo/curro/qtec/qt5022/build-qt5022-cesium/build/tmp/deploy/deb/all/Release >>>> >>>> This is why it is called with PSEUDO_UNLOAD. >>>> >>>> apt-ftparchive is also a more efficient replacement of >>>> dpkg-scanpackages: >>>> >>>> >>>> root@neopili:~/curro/qtec/qt5022/build-qt5022-cesium/build/tmp/deploy/deb/bobcat >>>> _64# time PSEUDO_UNLOAD=1 apt-ftparchive packages . >/tmp/kkk >>>> real 0m26.873s >>>> user 0m20.968s >>>> sys 0m1.212s >>>> >>>> >>>> root@neopili:~/curro/qtec/qt5022/build-qt5022-cesium/build/tmp/deploy/deb/bobcat >>>> _64# time PSEUDO_UNLOAD=1 dpkg-scanpackages . >/tmp/kkk >>>> dpkg-scanpackages: info: Wrote 6022 entries to output Packages file. >>>> real 0m59.721s >>>> user 0m16.668s >>>> sys 0m11.164s >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.riba...@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass | 4 +++- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> >>> This doesn't apply against master? What was this tested against? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Richard >>> >> >> >> > -- Ricardo Ribalda -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core