On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>wrote:
> If we run "bitbake -S base-files" today, and re-run it tomorrow with > nothing changed, we would see that the do_install.sigdata changes > because of: > > do_intall -> do_install_basefilesissue -> DISTRO_VERSION -> DATE > > We had set: > IMAGE_NAME[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME" > in meta/conf/bitbake.conf, we can set a similar line in > base-files_3.0.14.bb to fix the problem. > > [YOCTO #6032] > > Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com> > Wont't this mean base-files wouldn't be rebuilt when the day changes? This seems problematic to me. I think this is a legitimate case for a checksum change. If the distro version changes due to the date changing, and the base-files includes the distro version in the issue file, then we'd *want* base-files to rebuild to ensure the issue file is correct, otherwise it'd be inaccurate, no? -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core