On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>wrote:

> If we run "bitbake -S base-files" today, and re-run it tomorrow with
> nothing changed, we would see that the do_install.sigdata changes
> because of:
>
> do_intall -> do_install_basefilesissue -> DISTRO_VERSION -> DATE
>
> We had set:
> IMAGE_NAME[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME"
> in meta/conf/bitbake.conf, we can set a similar line in
> base-files_3.0.14.bb to fix the problem.
>
> [YOCTO #6032]
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
>

Wont't this mean base-files wouldn't be rebuilt when the day changes? This
seems problematic to me. I think this is a legitimate case for a checksum
change. If the distro version changes due to the date changing, and the
base-files includes the distro version in the issue file, then we'd *want*
base-files to rebuild to ensure the issue file is correct, otherwise it'd
be inaccurate, no?
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to