On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:32:49 +0100 Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The issue is the lack of the xattr headers from what I saw, not the > xattr support itself and we're missing what looks like a single define. > For the complexity, I did wonder if we should ship a default... Hmm. We could in theory add a test to the configure script for the header, and just hard-code that value in a couple of places. I don't think we actually need the header for much else. I don't know how stable that value is across distros or anything, though. I assume it's pretty stable. The main thing is that I've tried to avoid making dependencies on compile checks like "can I compile something using this header" because those are annoying and slow. > Adding in the xattr-native dependency may well be easier than updating > the docs on dependencies on all the different distros. -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core