On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 07:11 -0700, akuster wrote: > On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com> wrote: > >> Add GNUv3 license > > If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove > > nettle 2.1, for people building without any v3 code in the images. > > They have what they call dual license in 3.x ( GPLv2 or GPLv3). We > certainly can keep 2.7.1
Is it "GPLv2 or GPLv3" or "GPLv2 and GPLv3". There is a big difference and the LICENSE field needs to be set correctly (&& or || in the license field). Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core