On 16 July 2014 18:18, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > The only other concern I have is there is a COPYING.GPLv3, you might want to > check with the upstream what the intent of having that License file is for, > do they intend on some parts being v3 and if so which parts?
They'll need a LGPLv3 license alongside the GPLv2 license if they're dual-licensing, but we should checksum the "LGPLv3 or GPLv2" statement if it's written down anywhere in the tarball (which I hope it is) so we get alerted if they ever decide to be LGPLv3+ only. > I am not sure if the INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE will handle the OR properly, but > we should just have one version. The INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE checks do handle "or" license statements. Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
