On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 10:10:28 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/07/2014 08:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > The fitImage is a successor of the U-Boot uImage format, which is > > considered legacy for years now. The fitImage allows packing multiple > > kernel images, DTBs and other artifacts into a single image, which can > > then be protected by SHA checksums and does even support signing the > > images for verified boot. > > > > This patchset is the first stab at adding the new image format into > > Yocto. > > > > Marek Vasut (5): > > Yocto: kernel: Rework do_uboot_mkimage > > Yocto: kernel: Pull out the linux.bin generation > > Yocto: kernel: Clean up KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE > > Yocto: kernel: Build DTBs early > > Yocto: kernel: Add basic fitImage support > > > > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 229 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dtb.inc | 14 +- > > 2 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > Hi Marek, > > I am going to make a general request, can you please review the Commit > Guildlines Wiki for Openembedded: > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > > We appreciate your patches, but the commit messages need to be formatted > correctly. The Yocto: tag is not needed and you could clearly include > which recipe, bbclass, file or subsystem (if across multiple files) so > in the above it would be kernel.bbclass: ... > > If you could please resubmit your changes with the correct commit > summary for this series and your other patches that would be greatly > appreciated. > > Myself and others may have further feedback on your patches.
Ah, thanks! I'll give it a few days and will do V2 as per guidelines. Sorry for the mistake. Best regards, Marek Vasut -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
