On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:50:33PM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:16:28PM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:37:09AM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> > > > The 'opkg-key' utility requires gpg to manage the list of trusted keys.
> > > > The
> > > > ability to verify package signatures is not much use without the
> > > > ability to add
> > > > keys to the trusted list...
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk>
> > > > ---
> > > > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > > b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > > index ba21d84..56c54b6 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ OPKGLIBDIR = "${target_localstatedir}/lib"
> > > >
> > > > PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
> > > >
> > > > -PACKAGECONFIG[gpg] = "--enable-gpg,--disable-gpg,gpgme libgpg-error"
> > > > +PACKAGECONFIG[gpg] = "--enable-gpg,--disable-gpg,gpgme
> > > > libgpg-error,gnupg"
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be gpgme?
> > >
> >
> > Which bit? The PACKAGECONFIG name or one of the comma separated fields?
> >
>
> Sorry Martin, I didn't understand your comment. Could you clarify for me?Sorry for late reply, I haven't noticed your earlier e-mail. It has build-time dependency on gpgme and runtime dependency on gnupg (in comma separated fields) - it could be OK, I just wasn't sure. Is opkg-key calling gnupg tools? > Thanks, > > -- > Paul Barker > > Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk > http://www.paulbarker.me.uk -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
