On 9/5/14, 10:27 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 5 September 2014 15:55, Dan McGregor <danismostlik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 September 2014 03:14, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
On 3 September 2014 20:57, Dan McGregor <danismostlik...@gmail.com> wrote:
sed -i -e 's:=/root:=${ROOT_HOME}:g' ${S}/units/*.service*
+ sed -i -e 's:"/root":"${ROOT_HOME}":g' \
+ ${S}/src/core/unit-printf.c \
+ ${S}/src/nspawn/nspawn.c \
+ ${S}/src/shared/util.c
Sedding service files is one thing, but entire C files is another.
Can you please sent this change as a patch to the source? FWIW for
patches where the context isn't that relevant I've started using
patches without the context lines so there's more chance of them
applying in future releases.
I thought that myself, but ${ROOT_HOME} is a variable. I think to do
that a patch would
need to make the root home directory configurable, and not simply
hardcode it. That shouldn't
be too hard to do. I'll do that later tonight.
Sed the patch? :)
Creative solutions welcome, I'm just wary of such loose seds in source
code. If the only sane way is to sed then that's what we'll have to
do.
I'd prefer a patch that used a define myself. I don't like seds of source or
patches...
--Mark
Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
