> Op 3 nov. 2014, om 17:08 heeft Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> On 3 November 2014 15:24, Koen Kooi <koen.k...@linaro.org> wrote:
> It's been over a month and libpng is still broken, so I refuse to classify 
> this new process as 'helpful' or as 'appreciated' at this point.
> 
> Remember that 1.7 was frozen solid for several weeks of that month, so no it 
> wouldn't have been merged in that time period.  It's only just re-opened: 
> master is currently 80 patches ahead of dizzy, 35 in the C-Pull I sent last 
> night, and another 33 in my staging branch right now so it's not like we're 
> taking it easy right now.
> 
> Some context: during September it was obvious that various parties had an 
> interest in aarch64 (Linaro and Wind River).  Patches to fix build failures 
> were being sent sporadically, a qemuarm64 machine was submitted, but there 
> was no kernel for said machine to actually build.   At the time there was no 
> qemuarm64 machine that actually worked, so even merging the "simple" fixes on 
> just faith that they're correct would be reckless considering we were 
> freezing.  This is why I suggested[1] that someone with a vested interest in 
> aarch64 collate all the patches into a single branch and keep it rebased to 
> master so that when master opens, it can be tested on *all* qemu 
> architectures and merged.  It appears that this hasn't happened.  Will Linaro 
> be able to create a branch that incorporates all of the patches and new 
> machine that's been tested as a whole?

Most likely not because we already have meta-aarch64 for the toolchain and 
kernel support. But aside from that, the past few *years* it wasn't a problem 
to get aarch64 related patches merged into OE-core, so why is there suddenly 
such a problem now?

Furthermore, this libpng patch isn't strictly an aarch64 patch, it fixes a 
previous commit that should have been flagged in review as being wrong for 
using double qualifiers in a bogus way. So why did the culprit go in and the 
fix submitted 3 days later not?
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to