> Op 10 nov. 2014, om 11:38 heeft Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > I've tried upstreaming a patch against procps by sending it to the > listed maintainer and the mailing list and I've had no reply from > either. The last change to the CVS repository seems to be 3 years old > and the mailing list archive is mostly just full of spam. > > It looks like Arch Linux, Debian, Fedora and openSUSE have moved on to > procps-ng. I suggest we do the same during the v1.8 development cycle > if possible. procps-ng is actively developed and looks to be open to > patches. > > I'm sadly pretty limited on development time at the minute but I may > be able to give this a go in December. I'd rather focus the time I do > have on opkg though so if anyone else wants to pick this up that'd be > great.
With the util-linux -> util-linux-ng -> util-linux change in mind I strongly encourage to keep using 'procps' are package name or ensure that the appropriate (R)PROVIDES are in place. regards, Koen -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
