On Thu, 2014-12-25 at 10:19 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> Rebase groff-1.22.2-correct-man.local-install-path.patch to 1.22.3
>
> Refer what debian did, we add perl to RRECOMMENDS_${PN}, here is the
> explanation in groff 1.22.3 README:
> ...
> Additionally, producing `PDF' output directly with the `gropdf' device needs
> a working installation of `perl'. The same is true for some other
> preprocessors like `chem'.
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
> ---
> ...off-1.22.2-correct-man.local-install-path.patch | 32 ---------------
> .../groff-correct-man.local-install-path.patch | 45
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../groff/{groff_1.22.2.bb => groff_1.22.3.bb} | 7 ++--
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644
> meta/recipes-extended/groff/groff-1.22.2/groff-1.22.2-correct-man.local-install-path.patch
> create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-extended/groff/groff-1.22.3/groff-correct-man.local-install-path.patch
> rename meta/recipes-extended/groff/{groff_1.22.2.bb => groff_1.22.3.bb} (89%)
Given the original error message, if you build this on a machine
with /bin/perl, does it not still give an error at rootfs time?
Do we need to correctly set the path to perl in the recipe?
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
