On 29 January 2015 at 10:10, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.deche...@linaro.org>
wrote:

> well, i am not sure this is right... at least probably not the right
> argument. oe-core is not meant to be tied to specific intel stable
> releases, whether it is about content or  schedule..
>
> i would believe our goal is to provide the most recent stable release
> instead. so that each OE (well, Yocto) release ends up with the most
> recent versions.
>
> fwiw, for the boards/platforms i care about, 10.4.3 would be fine.
>

Agreed.  The Intel driver release is tested with 10.4.0 but 10.4.3 is a
newer point release so should work, and Intel's aim of ensuring that the
latest driver stack is supported doesn't trump having the latest upstream
releases in oe-core.

If it turns out that 10.4.3 is critically broken with the Intel driver then
*meta-intel* can ship 10.4.0.

Please re-submit this with 10.4.3 instead of 10.4.0.

Ross
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to