On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 08:22 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:28:52PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:31:37PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: > > > > Am 02.05.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Andrea Adami: > > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Has anyone ever seen this message during <image>.do_rootfs task? > > > > >> > > > > >> Collected errors: > > > > >> * opkg_install_pkg: Package <package> md5sum mismatch. Either the > > > > >> opkg or the package index are corrupt. Try 'opkg update'. > > > > >> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package <package>. > > > > >> > > > > >> We started seeing it on random packages inside the <image> few weeks > > > > >> ago on > > > > >> different machines. At the time we had switched to bitbake 1.26. But > > > > >> even > > > > >> trying different bitbake versions still occasionally caused the same > > > > >> error, so > > > > >> the culprit is still unknwon. Using oe-core/daisy for now. > > > > >> > > > > >> Any comments or suggestions to where start looking would be > > > > >> appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > yes, I have seen this during multimachine builds. > > > > > My TMPDIR is on tmpfs in ram so everytime I reboot it is re-populated > > > > > from sstate. > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > We have the same problem here. Also with packages from the "all" feed > > > > in a > > > > multimachine build environment. But it does not seem related to > > > > packagegroups. > > > > > > > > I've a hypothesis but was not able to validate or falsify it till now: > > > > Given > > > > a recipe which does only use file:// type SRC_URI. If i change > > > > something in > > > > these sources and do not update PR the prserv/hashing mechanism detects > > > > the > > > > changes a builds a new package. But this package has the same version > > > > info > > > > as the one before. So for opkg there's no need to update it's "package > > > > database". > > > > > > After fixing few of our own goofs in packagegroups, I still saw this > > > issue > > > with some real packages like weston-init. It went away after it got > > > rebuilt > > > due to the dependencies, but I'll keep an eye on it and report if it > > > comes > > > back... > > > > Ok, so on the second day it failed again on weston-init and couple of our > > own > > packages. They are all marked as allarch, but it seems they get re-packaged > > for some reason for different machines in multi-machine build - the > > timestamp > > of the ipk package changed, while nothing else in the recipe or its data > > has > > changed. There's nothing obvious in weston-init I can see that would > > trigger > > it. And in the logs I see that do_package_write_ipk_setscene being > > triggered - > > I'm trying to figure out why... Any pointers? > > There are many recipes with incorrect PACKAGE_ARCH, see latest report > from world build: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-January/100734.html > > weston-init is one of recipes where I've sent change to drop allarch > long time ago: > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/74133/
One thing we didn't discuss in that thread but which might help would be whitelisting update-rc.d as a dependency? If that is the cause of many of the problems, that would help. In this case it does look like the weston RDEPENDS is the problem and and the ABISAFE variable is the better way to fix it though. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
