On 05/12/2015 12:06 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 23:03 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 09:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote:
| tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xe8): undefined reference to `.LCL0'
| tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xf7): undefined reference to `.LCL0'
thanks Khem
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
index 03a24f0..22b111a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ inherit autotools gettext
acpaths = "-I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal -I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal_java"
+FULL_OPTIMIZATION_powerpc_remove = "-O2"
+FULL_OPTIMIZATION_append_powerpc = " -Os "
+
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=741d3bf91144973d26de647039fa60b87a09edf1
fixes same issue for libx11
I am wondering if we should make this change in some common config
metadata file to list all recipes that need this workaround
untill gcc is fixed for it may be arch-powerpc.inc, since then it will
be easy to remember to unbolt them once gcc is fixed.
I like the idea of a common include to handle this a lot better.
FWIW, I tried gcc 5 on the autobuilder. The results were 141 failures so
far:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=1426e31f0bcd19f066931d2ecbdec3752b14e88e&limit=150
With the gcc patch I've posted applied:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=5fd0b7c163f4f3312bea9bd3246a6bd67a8da594&limit=100
so down to 57 errors. There are a few themes:
* linux-yocto 3.14 gcc5 issues
* meta-fsl-ppc and metafsl-arm gcc5 issues, particularly kernel
* poky-lsb issues with the security flags and gcc5
* x32 failed with a race of some kind in glibc, suspect transient
* gcc-target has a packaging issue which fails builds (have patch)
The good news is that the various ppc issues are fixed including the rpm
one from this series.
Have you tried arm64?
kernel did not build ( as of last week) and I have not yet tried the
kernel patches Khem pointed out.
- armin
Ross: The backports we were looking at are for warnings, not errors on
the most part.
Otavio: Could you see what our options are with meta-fsl-ppc and
metafsl-arm?
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
