On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-numpy_1.7.0.bb | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-numpy_1.7.0.bb >> b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-numpy_1.7.0.bb >> index d4fd279..28ad97f 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-numpy_1.7.0.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-numpy_1.7.0.bb >> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ CONFIGFILESURI_i586 = " \ >> file://config.h \ >> file://numpyconfig.h \ >> " >> +CONFIGFILESURI_i686 = " \ >> + file://config.h \ >> + file://numpyconfig.h \ >> +” > > > can we use x86 override instead ?
Yes, I'll send a v2. I'm hopeful that this set of fixes will be acceptable for fido, which is why I initially went for adding i686 over-rides instead of a more widespread clean-up to replace i586 with x86. >> CONFIGFILESURI_x86-64 = " \ >> file://config.h \ >> file://_numpyconfig.h \ >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
