On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:12 PM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/14/15 9:13 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:56 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Alejandro, >>> >>> This looks to be a new recipe. I don't believe dizzy is taking new features. >> Contextual. If its a leaf recipe in terms of dependencies, I don't see any >> harm. > > It is still a new recipe. If adding new recipes is something that > should be allowed on a maintenance release, then the policy should be > updated. I still not in favor of adding new recipes nor features to a > maintenance release.
We should help people to move to Fido, not to stay in Dizzy. I am against this backport as Fido is already out. I would be fine to add new recipes for Fido as it helps people to stay in a Stable release but for oldstable I see no benefit. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
