Hello Bruno, On 16.06.2015 20:11, Bottazzini, Bruno wrote: > Ping > > On Sex, 2015-06-05 at 13:52 -0300, Bottazzini, Bruno wrote: >> Ping. >> >> On Ter, 2015-05-19 at 10:18 -0300, Bottazzini, Bruno wrote: >>> On Qui, 2015-05-14 at 00:41 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>>> Hello Bruno, >>>> >>>> On 13.05.2015 23:51, Bruno Bottazzini wrote: >>>>> +######################################################################## >>>>> +# Aggregation of Split Packages >>>>> +######################################################################## >>>>> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-services-base" >>>>> +SUMMARY_${PN}-services-base = "Base services aggregation" >>>>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-services-base = "1" >>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-services-base = " \ >>>> >>>> I think it would be better to use RRECOMMENDS, in order to support >>>> BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS per image. This would also remove the need to use >>>> bb.utils.contains, because unavailable recommended packages get ignored >>>> by the package managers. >>> >>> I don't think if we should use RRECOMENDS. >>> >>> There are some packages described in services-base that it is not on the >>> default PACKAGECONFIG. >>> >>> With RRECOMENDS and with out bb.utils.contains, it will install all the >>> packages that it is described on the recipe and this is not the behavior >>> we are looking for. >>> >>>> >>>> Besides that, I wonder whether ${PN}-services would be a better name, >>>> because the -base suffix suggests that it contained only the most >>>> important services. >>> >>> Sure, we can change it. >>>
I guess your patch wasn't applied, because your last answer let expect a follow-up patch. There may be other reasons I don't know about (complexity for example). Note that I'm not the maintainer of this recipe. I just shared my thoughts as a user. Regards, Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core