On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 9 July 2015 at 15:32, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > aren't github archives regenerated from time to time with different
> > checksums?
> >
> 
> Yes.  I keep on meaning to write a QA test for this. :)

FWIW: someone in systemd herd said that now the archives on github
should be stable as long as git-archive is stable.
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg33014.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg33015.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg33017.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg33016.html

Now they are using them instead of proper tarballs:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg33054.html

> Cristi - if this is the best libical has as a tarball release then we
> should do a proper git clone.  Amazingly, the download button on their
> website links to a tarball of master which is borderline reckless.
> 
> Ross

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to