Currently the virtclass override is added too late to be taken into
account when DEPENDS and other variables are processed by the virtclass
extension code. This sets the overrides in a more optimal place, meaning
they are accounted for in variables like DEPENDS.

Recipes in meta-oe like libwmf-native showed the issue.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/meta/classes/native.bbclass b/meta/classes/native.bbclass
index 71b0572..bcbcd61 100644
--- a/meta/classes/native.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/native.bbclass
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ python native_virtclass_handler () {
                 newdeps.append(dep)
         d.setVar(varname, " ".join(newdeps))
 
+    e.data.setVar("OVERRIDES", e.data.getVar("OVERRIDES", False) + 
":virtclass-native")
+
     map_dependencies("DEPENDS", e.data)
     for pkg in [e.data.getVar("PN", True), "", "${PN}"]:
         map_dependencies("RDEPENDS", e.data, pkg)
@@ -161,7 +163,7 @@ python native_virtclass_handler () {
             nprovides.append(prov)
     e.data.setVar("PROVIDES", ' '.join(nprovides))
 
-    e.data.setVar("OVERRIDES", e.data.getVar("OVERRIDES", False) + 
":virtclass-native")
+
 }
 
 addhandler native_virtclass_handler


-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to