On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 05:50 -0500, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 17:17 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > > From: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com> > > > > Add KERNEL_IMAGETYPES to support building packaging and installing > > multi types of kernel images, such as zImage uImage, at one time. > > KERNEL_IMAGETYPE works as it did. > > > > Fixes [YOCTO #6945]. > > > > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com> > > --- > > meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 21 +++--- > > meta/classes/kernel-grub.bbclass | 46 ++++++++---- > > meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass | 22 +++--- > > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 128 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > meta/conf/documentation.conf | 1 + > > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dtb.inc | 15 ++-- > > 6 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > > I put this into master-next just to see what happened. I haven't > reviewed the code in more detail as yet. We saw: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/build-appliance/builds/418/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio > > as one of the results and I suspect the linux-yocto packaging issue > comes from this. This suggests ipk packaging was not tested :(.
Also, if I have to guess, I think the uboot mkimage failure from: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/83/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio may be from this patch. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core