On 08/12/2015 07:14 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
Hi,
I realise I'm a bit late (with the commit in master already) but I'm
looking at upgrading this recipe and had some questions on this patch
and the recipe in general.
On 9 August 2015 at 08:28, Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote:
adding the license definitions on the few packages that
deviate from the overall package license.
based on http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/nettle.html#Copyright
and spot checking files.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
index f53afcc..f9d331f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
@@ -2,6 +2,15 @@ SUMMARY = "A low level cryptographic library"
HOMEPAGE = "http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/";
SECTION = "libs"
LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2"
I think this is wrong, whichever version you look at -- our current
version is just "LGPLv2.1+", the current upstream release is "LGPLv3+
| GPLv2+"
I'm going to send a patch upgrading the recipe to the current upstream
release (and setting license to "LGPLv3+ | GPLv2+"): it might seem
like this makes gnutls effectively LGPLv3 but that actually happened
last year with the gmp upgrade. Comments on this welcome.
I believe that conversation should be in the mailing list archive.
For me LGPLv2+ makes is all version above GPL2, but since I am not a
lawyer it makes not sense on how to play that game. So I decided to drop
pressuring the update.
- Armin
+LICENSE_${PN}-cast = "CC0"
+LICENSE_${PN}-gosthash = "MIT"
+
+# both public and GPL license listed
+LICENSE_${PN}-md2 = "CC0 & LGPLv2.1+"
+LICENSE_${PN}-md4 = "CC0 & LGPLv2.1+"
From the reference I had the impression this "LICENSE_something"
construct would imply there is a package "something". But the nettle
recipe does not produce "nettle-cast" or any of these. What is the
purpose here?
Thanks,
Jussi
+
+
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1 \
file://serpent-decrypt.c;beginline=53;endline=67;md5=bcfd4745d53ca57f82907089898e390d
\
file://serpent-set-key.c;beginline=56;endline=70;md5=bcfd4745d53ca57f82907089898e390d"
--
2.3.5
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
