On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> wrote: > On 08/19/2015 10:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 17 August 2015 at 16:41, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> There are many reasons, for me its overlay support for systemd-nspawn, >>>> networkd has got many new features that is now usable w.r.t. IP forwarding, >>>> vxlan etc. >>>> and it has many bug fixed in those 2000 odd commits since 219, no >>>> different then any other package upgrades we do in general it keep the >>>> upgrade workload lower as we roll the releases. >>>> Any specific concerns ? >>> >>> >>> Can we get an updated patch with a clearer commit log? > > I've also heard that as systemd evolves, more binaries are getting added > to the base package that should be packaged separately for people > interested in small images. I do not have personal experience here, but > wanted to pass along the feedback. > > We should look at buildhistory packaging differences when we do upgrades.
Here is the diff between files in 219 and 224, if you want to know more I can paste more info just let me know. https://gist.github.com/kraj/2a066973a5e5cf83ed24 sizes have gone up on daemons, no new daemons besides some new service files and scripts are added -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
