On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:02 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > > The unconditional removal of -DWITHOUT_XATTR accidentally introduced a > > compile-time dependency on "acl", because "sys/acl.h" gets > > included. This caused random compile failures. > > > > To fix this, we introduce a proper PACKAGECONFIG for the "xattr" > > support, with the distro's "xattr" feature determining the > > default. Setting the define must be done with custom code because > > PACKAGECONFIG can only influence configure parameters. > > > > The "acl" distro feature is not checked because although enabling > > "xattr" support now triggers a build of acl, nothing from it will not > > get included in the resulting target image. > > Typo?
Yes, the "not" needs to be removed. Can whoever merges the patch fix that or should I send a revised version? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core