On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If Richard doesn't want to use gerrit for OE-core, that doesn't exclude > > others from using it for the layers they manage, does it? > > yes, however, we should prefer this to run on oe domain, its better > for project and then if most of layers use it its fine too, it could > end up > with same situation as patchwork where oe-core and bitbake do not use > it actively. other layers do. its not ideal situation but its ok as > long as > its makes people productive, we could be open for options its matter > of volunteers then maintaining the infra for these services.
I agree, there are not technical reasons for not using it for other layers, but once we ask contributors to create account on gerrit and submit all patches through gerrit for *some* layers, then these people will ask why oe-core and bitbake submissions are different. I should also say that I really like gerrit work-flow and review, but if people continue to send patches to e-mail and someone else will need to add Change-Ids to them and consolidate them into review-chains, than it's not as great as it could be if all related people "buy-it" and use it exclusively. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
