On 6 December 2015 at 18:22, Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> wrote:

> Close, but not quite, I think.  It doesn't look like it addresses the
> ordering mismatch that occurs due to the -vfp include being processed
> before the -neon include, resulting vfpv4 preceding neon in
> ARMPKGSFX_FPU when both are enabled.
>

Martin's patch is in my ross/mut branch so will be in master soon, can you
rebase these patches please?

Ross
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to