On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:56:48PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 2 December 2015 at 07:56, Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@intel.com> wrote: > > > meta/recipes-core/jpeg/jpeg_9a.bb | 29 ------------------- > > meta/recipes-core/jpeg/libjpeg-turbo_8d+1.4.2.bb | 36 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > (CCing the usual suspects who will notice and care about this) > > I've just noticed that this means that when the binary packages are > debian-renamed the version goes backwards: libjpeg-9a to libjpeg-8d+1.4.2. > Does anyone have an opinion on either: > > 1) ignore it
I'm ok with ignoring it, because all DISTROs I care about were always using libjpeg-turbo. > 2) put an PE (epoch) in libjpeg-turbo > 3) configure the debian renaming so the library has a different name > (libjpeg-turbo, presumably) > > Ross -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
