On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> xz gives better compression results than bzip/gz but is often slower.
> Using parallel compression mitigates this somewhat and is particularly
> useful for the SDK.

I have proposed another tool called pxz back in Sept last year
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-September/110971.html

although pixz seems to be well maintained and active, would be nice to
know what do people mostly use.

>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/pixz/pixz_1.0.6.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-support/pixz/pixz_1.0.6.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e6e4ac2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/pixz/pixz_1.0.6.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +SUMMARY = "Parallel, indexed xz compressor"
> +
> +DEPENDS = "xz libarchive"
> +
> +SRC_URI = 
> "https://github.com/vasi/pixz/releases/download/v${PV}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz";
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "f6dc5909c9a31b192f69aa397ae8df48"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "02c50746b134fa1b1aae41fcc314d7c6f1919b3d48bcdea01bf11769f83f72e8"
> +
> +LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=5cf6d164086105f1512ccb81bfff1926"
> +
> +inherit autotools
> +
> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to