On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 13:27 +0800, Jian Liu wrote: > > kernel-dev is replaced by kernel-devsrc > > No, its not. > > > , which breaks > > backward compaibilty. > > -- add alias for kernel-devsrc > > -- kernel-devsrc provides the kernel-dev. > > -- remove kernel-dev from the sub-packages of linux-windriver > > kernel-dev is useful for things like profiling tools where you need > things like system.Map or the kernel configuration without source code. > > If you need the "full" source, you can use kernel-devsrc. > > I'm not sure we want to remove kernel-dev given it does have a use? > And I have an open bugzilla to validate (and likely fix) kernel-dev/kernel-devsrc against out of tree module builds, ensure that they can both the be installed on the target at the same time, and also so document how they map to the packaging breakdown of kernel source in other distros. Strangely, I was just hacking on that yesterday while working with Saul on udev problems. So for the short term, leaving everything as-is makes the most sense to me. Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
