On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > > > A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. > > > > > > > What's the rationale for adding this to oe-core over another layer? > > None, besides the original stress is in oe-core. What other layer would you > suggest?
Ross, Care do make your own suggestion? Do you think meta-oe would be a better fit? Are there any other considerations, since stress-ng is a replacement of the original stress and it was added to oe-core? Thanks. -- Denys -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core