On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> > Was there some agreement about variable name? >> >> meta-qt5 5.6 is using this so we need a final decision if it will be >> merged or not. I am in favor it as I think it is clear enough. > > It was an RFC and I still don't get a good feeling about the names > used. > > I suggested: > > PACKAGECONFIG_CONFPARAMS > or > PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS
I like CONFARGS. > as it then makes things slightly clearer these things are coming from > PACKAGECONFIG. We have a namespace which is a bit of a mess and I'd > prefer to try and improve with new things if we can... > > The fact meta-qt5 is already using this is bad, it really shouldn't be. > We're also very close to the final build of 2.1 right now so this would > be a very late change :/. I think it is a safe change but I am fine in postponing it for 2.2. In this case we need to revert the usage of it in meta-qt5 (which I also support). Martin? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core