On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 22:18:34 Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Paul Eggleton >> >> <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, 26 May 2016 13:46:21 Cliff Brake wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@intel.com> > wrote: >> >> > meta-java repo was moved to: >> >> > git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java >> >> > >> >> > Is it possible to update the list with that info? >> >> >> >> Done, thanks! >> >> >> >> https://github.com/cbrake/openembedded-admin/commit/51604da79ed5a02341562 >> >> a9b f254b3dd9dc71704 >> > >> > At some point it would be great if this script could be driven from the OE >> > layer index rather than being a separate entity - then updates would >> > largely be self-service for the maintainers, or at least they would only >> > need to be done in one place. >> >> Maybe a bit off-topic but layer index should have some mechanism of >> removing rotten layers. > > We've discussed this on-and-off at OE developer meetings for a while now. FWIW > I can remove them manually - actually I just got around to deleting meta- > picosam9 which has been unmaintained for years. > > Part of the problem though is determining what "rotten" actually means. > Additionally, there's an element of leaving things around in case someone > comes to fork/revive them again. We do show a "last updated" date but it would > be good to figure out some other way of determining and indicating "layer > health" - to date I don't think we've managed to figure out anything practical > for that. > At least meta-kf5 is a candidate. I think it has never worked and meta-qt5-extra is (try give my best) - maintained.
What about meta-kde4? Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core