On June 16, 2016 18:10:09 Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 16 June 2016 at 21:49, Mark Asselstine <mark.asselst...@windriver.com> > > > > wrote: > >> While waiting to hear back about my inquiry I did take some > >> time to put together this patch that allows things that > >> require the older vte to continue to build. Since xfce4-terminal > >> lives in meta-openembedded this might make more sense to carry > >> over there. I am sure folks will have an opinion so sending this > >> out as an RFC. > > > > That's certainly a good argument for putting the old vte in meta-oe. > > The meta-oe layers generally have a higher priority than oe-core, so > having an older version in meta-oe and a newer version in oe-core can > lead to unexpected results.
This should not be an issue. My change has the old recipe renamed with the API version so the old version becomes referenced by 'vte-0.0' (per the commit log the 0.0 is consistent with the API versioning upstream). So recipes which require the old version, like xfce4-terminal, have to have their DEPENDS adjusted accordingly. There should be no surprises. I will have a closer look today to ensure nothing in oe-core is requiring the old version and if not I will prepare a patch for meta-oe since that seems to be the general agreement for a home for this. I need to do some further checks and runtime tests but I will get this out shortly. In the meantime anyone else running in to the build failure can exploit the RFC patch. Mark > > > Ross > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core