On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 15:12 -0700, Joe Slater wrote: > Even though we are just a script, we do depend on > systemd being on the target and need an RDEPENDS > which means we cannot also be allarch. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jsla...@windriver.com> > --- > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-compat-units.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-compat-units.bb > b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-compat-units.bb > index f246e83..421fc06 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-compat-units.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-compat-units.bb > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ DEPENDS = "systemd-systemctl-native" > > S = "${WORKDIR}" > > -inherit allarch distro_features_check > +inherit distro_features_check
+1 from me. The alternative solution would be to add "systemd-compat-units->systemd" to SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS in meta/conf/layer.conf, but that's more complicated and probably not worth it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core