On 10/17/2016 02:09 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:40 -0500,
leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com>
Distro poky-tiny cannot build the core-image-full-cmdline image, so
skip the
test if this is the case.
[YOCTO #8525]
Wouldn't it be better to use a different image, most likely with extra
packages installed, and maybe a different list of TEST_SUITES for poky-
tiny so that we're still testing this functionality on poky-tiny?
Yes, that is a good idea. Which image and the accompanied tests do you
suggest?
Thanks,
Joshua
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.in
tel.com>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py
b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py
index c2d5b45..e17c261 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ class TestImage(oeSelfTest):
Product: oe-core
Author: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lo...@intel.com>
"""
+ if self.distro == 'poky-tiny':
+ self.skipTest('core-image-full-cmdline not buildable for
poky-tiny')
features = 'INHERIT += "testimage"\n'
features += 'TEST_SUITES = "ping ssh selftest"\n'
--
2.1.4
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
