On 11/17/2016 06:14 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 16 November 2016 at 00:50, Francisco Pedraza
<francisco.j.pedraza.gonza...@intel.com
<mailto:francisco.j.pedraza.gonza...@intel.com>> wrote:
Will verify the following:
1. Compile a minimal image.
2. The compiled image will add the created layer with the
recipes postinstz postinsta postinstb postinstd postinstp postinstt
created previously at "meta-selftest/recipes-test"
2. Run qemu
3. Validate the task execution order.
V4
This is missing the test that some postinsts should be happening at
rootfs time.
I have assigned the bug 8433 and I will send a different patch to add
those test cases, I'm just waiting to the final implementation of this
patch to be accepted to avoid execution and merge conflicts.
Also, can it permute PACKAGE_CLASSES (rotate through all three
options) so it exercises all backends.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Pedraza
<francisco.j.pedraza.gonza...@intel.com
<mailto:francisco.j.pedraza.gonza...@intel.com>>
---
.../recipes-test/postinsta/postinsta_1.0.bb
<http://postinsta_1.0.bb> | 20 +++++++++++
.../recipes-test/postinstb/postinstb_1.0.bb
<http://postinstb_1.0.bb> | 22 ++++++++++++
.../recipes-test/postinstd/postinstd_1.0.bb
<http://postinstd_1.0.bb> | 22 ++++++++++++
.../recipes-test/postinstp/postinstp_1.0.bb
<http://postinstp_1.0.bb> | 22 ++++++++++++
.../recipes-test/postinstt/postinstt_1.0.bb
<http://postinstt_1.0.bb> | 22 ++++++++++++
.../recipes-test/postinstz/postinstz_1.0.bb
<http://postinstz_1.0.bb> | 12 +++++++
For clarity can all of these be squashed into a single recipe with
clearer names?
Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
