Just pinging these patches, to see if there were any issues or
comments. I realize I sent them just before a release so it was very
likely they would get lost in the noise.

Thanks,
Nathan

On 21 October 2016 at 22:07, Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com> wrote:
> Check the value of UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE, as it is defaulted to "0" which
> for matches as True in python due to being a non-empty string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> index 8580247f82..3bbf91f65a 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ python __anonymous () {
>          # Verified boot will sign the fitImage and append the public key to
>          # U-boot dtb. We ensure the U-Boot dtb is deployed before assembling
>          # the fitImage:
> -        if d.getVar('UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE', True):
> +        if d.getVar('UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE', True) == "1":
>              uboot_pn = d.getVar('PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot', True) or 
> 'u-boot'
>              d.appendVarFlag('do_assemble_fitimage', 'depends', ' 
> %s:do_deploy' % uboot_pn)
>  }
> --
> 2.9.3
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to