On 21 December 2016 at 17:38, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 16:11 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> On 21 December 2016 at 15:11, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: >> > iasl is also provided by the meta-oe layer's acpica recipe. iasl is a >> > bit simpler and thus seems more suitable for OE-core. >> >> Simpler in what sense? > > Less code to compile, which might matter for people who just want a > working UEFI for qemu and nothing else. I haven't measured the > difference, though.
to build, it's taking 3-4 minutes on a 3 year old laptop (i5-2520m @ 2.5 Ghz). >> acpica recipe is trivial and provide fully acpica tools. >> Would you mind to import meta-oe acpica recipe instead of providing a >> reduced set of acpica for not much benefit? > > I don't have a strong opinion about this and would be fine with moving > acpica to OE-core instead, too. It would be nice. thanks. > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core